Lacrimal canalicular repairing using silicone intubation.

Lee, Jeong Jae; Cho, Joo Weon; Kim, Chang Wook; Yoo, Young Cheun; Yoo, Seog Keun; Kim, Sang Duck

Original Article

Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 1998;25(6):1108-1114.
Published online August 1, 1998.

Lacrimal canalicular repairing using silicone intubation.

Jeong Jae Lee, Joo Weon Cho, Chang Wook Kim, Young Cheun Yoo, Seog Keun Yoo, Sang Duck Kim

Abstract

Repairing of lacrimal canalicular laceration has some controversies on the golden time of surgery, the suture method, and the materials for stent. Recently, intubation of silicone tubes has become popular for repair of lacrimal canalicular injuries. Thirty-two cases of injured lacrimal canaliculi were repaired with use of silicone tube stents. The surgery can be done with monocanalicular(10 patients) or bicanalicular(22 patient) methods. The follow-up period was from two to eighteen months(mean ten months). Seven cases using the monocanalicular method and nineteen cases using the bicanalicular method were successful. Three cases of monocanalicular method had epiphora with canalicular obstruction due to early loss of the silicone tube. In monocanalicular method, postoperative complications were punctal granuloma(1 case), punctal slits(2 cases), and early loss of the silicone tube(3 cases). In bicanalicular method, postoperative complications were persistent epiphora during the period of intubaion(4 cases), conjunctival irritation sign(3 cases) and loop retraction(1 case). In conclusion, the success rate of bicanalicular stents were higher than that of monocanalicular stents for canalicular laceration. But the bicanalicular stent had some complications including cosmetic problem, possibility of injuries to the normal canaliculus during intubation, conjuntival irritation sign, and loop retraction.